Steel Cable-Stayed Bridge
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3bfa8/3bfa8352aa5e9934a9bb964c2ab1b4946403844f" alt="One Tower Stayed Bridge one tower stayed diagram"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d8af/1d8af6f290b38e6880dac7e0de10159eb71cdd91" alt="Two Tower Stayed Bridge two tower stayed diagram"
Although expensive, stayed bridges may be the only viable alternative when: there is no access to the gap, on which temporary or permanent piers could be built; when there is no staright level run up to the gap which would permit cantilever launching; when the span is too big for regular through truss bridges. And, in particular, one-tower bridges are useful if there is no good access to the far bank, as they can be built from one side only. But please note: you stll need enough space for the large counterweights, which may need to be one fifth of the spann for a two tower bridge.
- Long span (50m - 200m)
- Very strong, but also flexible
- Economical as allow a slender and lighter structure which is still able to span large distances
- Light weight is an advantage in earthquake-prone areas
- Modern and simple design makes attractive and distinct landmarks
- Easy to build in segments where in-situ construction or cantilever launch on rollers is not possible. This requires substantial piers and large counterweights
- Less suitable for very windy places due to its lightness
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38633/38633e56a877f25a5ca65921f1432708fbf432cf" alt="Queens awards Queens awards"